Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, No. SCD206829, David J. Danielsen, Judge.
IRION, J.
Ricardo Reyes pleaded guilty to robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) and residential burglary (id., § 459). Reyes also admitted the truth of a number of sentence enhancement allegations, including that Reyes had eight strike priors for residential burglary — all arising out of a July 2002 proceeding. After striking seven of the eight strike priors, the trial court sentenced Reyes to 15 years in prison: the upper term of five years in prison for the robbery offense, doubled, plus an additional five-year term by virtue of the remaining strike (id., § 667, subds. (a)(1), (e)(1).)
FACTS
On May 28, 2007, Reyes entered a home and carried out a laptop computer that he found on a table in the living room. As Reyes exited the home and attempted to drive away with the laptop, the laptop's owner emerged from the home and chased Reyes, grabbing onto the driver's side door and steering wheel of Reyes's car. Reyes punched the laptop's owner multiple times in the face through the open car window and dragged him several blocks with the moving car until the car crashed into a retaining wall. Reyes then fled the scene.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks that this court review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible, but not arguable, issues: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion by imposing the upper term (see People v. Sandoval (2007) 41 Cal.4th 825, 847); and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in striking only seven of Reyes's eight prior strikes (see People v. Carmony (2004) 33 Cal.4th 367, 377).
We granted Reyes permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.
A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Competent counsel has represented Reyes on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
WE CONCUR: HALLER, Acting P.J., O'ROURKE, J.