In Camacho, we stated that on appellate review erroneously admitted evidence is nevertheless "properly considered in a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence."
On this record—which in the light most favorable to the People includes evidence of bleeding in addition to pain inside the vagina—a "rational trier of fact could have found the essential element[] of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." People v. Sangalang, 2001 Guam 18 ¶ 20 (quoting People v. Reyes, 1998 Guam 32 ¶ 7).C. Motion for a New Trial
