People v. Reseigh

1 Citing case

  1. People v. Rubin

    223 Cal.App.2d 825 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)   Cited 8 times
    In People v. Rubin (1963) 223 Cal.App.2d 825, 835 [ 36 Cal.Rptr. 167, 9 A.L.R.3d 707], the court noted that "[t]he rule of law upon which the defendant relies requires that there be a `reasonable expectation of funds' as the source for payment of the check upon its presentation.

    Such evidence would be admissible for the purpose of showing that each check involved in the present case was made and delivered "wilfully, with intent to defraud." (See People v. Cuthbertson, 176 Cal.App.2d 393, 395 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 435]; People v. Reseigh, 200 Cal.App.2d 301, 303 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 199]; People v. Dick, 200 Cal.App.2d 424, 431 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 317].) [7] Complaint is made of the reference by the deputy district attorney in his argument to the jury to the defendant's testimony that his parole officer told him that he could not have a checking account.