Opinion
A145723
11-13-2019
In re RENO F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RENO F., Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (San Francisco City and County Super. Ct. No. JW14-6171)
In July 2016, this court issued an opinion upholding a term of Reno F.'s probation that, as modified by this court, required Reno to submit electronic devices under his control to a search of any text messages, voicemail messages, call logs, photographs, email accounts and social media accounts, and to provide any passwords necessary to access the specified information, at the request of a probation or peace officer.
In October 2019, the California Supreme Court transferred this case to this court with directions to vacate our decision and reconsider the cause in light of In re Ricardo P. (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1113. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).) In response to our order for supplemental briefing, respondent advised this court that Reno's juvenile probation has been superseded by an adult conviction and probation order, as well as additional pending adult cases, rendering issues related to the juvenile probation order moot. Respondent further advised us that counsel for appellant agrees the appeal is moot and authorized respondent to relay her agreement to this court.
Accordingly, our decision in this case filed on July 28, 2016, is vacated and the appeal is dismissed.
/s/_________
Kline, P.J. We concur: /s/_________
Stewart, J. /s/_________
Miller, J.