From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rembert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1984
105 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 5, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Inasmuch as defendant has failed to raise any objections to the adequacy of the plea allocution in the court of first instance, he has failed to preserve that issue for appellate review as a matter of law ( People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 N.Y.2d 997; People v Fernandez, 91 A.D.2d 1073). Nor is reversal warranted in the interest of justice since the record clearly reveals that defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered.

There is no merit to either of defendant's contentions that section 70.06 Penal of the Penal Law is unconstitutional (see People v Cates, 104 A.D.2d 895; People v Kepple, 98 A.D.2d 783; People v Caver, 74 A.D.2d 852; People v Brown, 46 A.D.2d 255) or that the sentence imposed upon him in this case is unduly harsh and excessive. Gibbons, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rembert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1984
105 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Rembert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY REMBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Velasquez

With regard to the defendant's contention that the second felony offender statute (see Penal Law, § 70.06) is…

People v. Singleton

With regard to the defendant's contention that the second felony offender statute (see Penal Law, § 70.06) is…