From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 1991
170 A.D.2d 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 14, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Murray Mogul, J., Franklin Weissberg, J.


None of defendant's claims concerning the prosecutor's summation have been preserved by specific objection, and in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, any alleged error would be considered harmless.

With respect to defendant's adjudication as a predicate felon, there was no infirmity in the underlying conviction. Defendant was plainly advised that if he failed to appear for sentencing, the court would not be bound by any sentencing recommendation, nor would defendant be entitled to withdraw his plea. (Cf., Innes v Dalsheim, 864 F.2d 974, cert denied ___, US ___, 107 L Ed 2d 19.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 1991
170 A.D.2d 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Reid

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND REID, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 252 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)