From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2005
22 A.D.3d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2002-11544.

October 17, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered December 12, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and a new trial is ordered.

The defendant is entitled to a new trial because of the serious misconduct committed by the prosecutor ( see People v. Mendez, 22 AD3d 688 [decided herewith]). The interest of justice warrants that the defendant be granted the same relief as his co-defendant, even though the defendant did not raise this issue on appeal ( see People v. Innis, 288 AD2d 236).


Summaries of

People v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2005
22 A.D.3d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Reid

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. REGGIE REID, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

22 A.D.3d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7717
801 N.Y.S.2d 905

Citing Cases

Reid v. Martuscello

As explained further infra, his conviction was ultimately reversed. See People v. Reid, 22 A.D.3d 690 (2d…

Mendez v. Graham

They would have all told you the same thing. It's not the quantity; it's the quality of the evidence," Id.…