Opinion
October 28, 1996.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), rendered April 5, 1994, convicting him of robbery in first degree (three counts) and robbery in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Before: Thompson, J.P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the verdict is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, People v Hayes, 210 AD2d 73; People v Jackson, 186 AD2d 517; People v Cruz, 173 AD2d 320). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15; People v Hayes, supra).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.