From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reeves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1975
50 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 9, 1975


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered July 13, 1973, convicting the defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the third degree, unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial directed. It was error for the police officers to testify over objections that the complaining witness identified the defendant as one of the culprits. This can be considered improper bolstering, and, the evidence of guilt not being overwhelming, the error may not be disregarded as harmless. (People v Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471; People v Malloy, 22 N.Y.2d 559, 567; People v Burton, 46 A.D.2d 774.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman, Murphy, Lupiano and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Reeves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1975
50 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

People v. Reeves

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY REEVES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

People v. Gonzalez

Thus, Ferraro's testimony amounted to classic identification bolstering, which has long been prohibited.…

People v. Blanchard

The receipt, however, merely reflected the police officer's state of mind. Furthermore, the police officer…