From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Redding

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 22, 2015
498 Mich. 944 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151540. COA No. 319255.

12-22-2015

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jermial Ali REDDING, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Redding

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 22, 2015
498 Mich. 944 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Redding

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jermial Ali…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 22, 2015

Citations

498 Mich. 944 (Mich. 2015)
872 N.W.2d 453

Citing Cases

Redding v. Horton

But Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court pursuant to People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich.…

Redding v. Horton

Because Petitioner's sentence was based on judge-found facts, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed that part…