From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reddick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 1993
199 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 21, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.).


Defendant's contention that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the issue of the voluntariness of his confession is unpreserved for this Court's review and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Were we to reach the issue, we would affirm. Read as a whole, the charge was proper (see, People v Coleman, 70 N.Y.2d 817).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Reddick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 1993
199 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Reddick

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL REDDICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

People v. Kelly

Defendant's challenge to the court's jury instruction on the issue of the voluntariness of his statements is…

People v. Alvares

However, defendant neither raised any objection at trial to the instruction that he now deems unacceptable…