From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Redd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 2011
81 A.D.3d 751 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2008-09507.

February 8, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered September 23, 2008, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Katherine A. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Sgroi and Miller, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in admitting evidence of the defendant's flight and in charging the jury that it might infer a consciousness of guilt therefrom. However, although the charge was not warranted under the circumstances of the case, any error in the admission of the flight evidence or in the charge was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, and no significant probability that the error contributed to his conviction ( see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242; People v Heman, 198 AD2d 434, 435; People v Alexander, 164 AD2d 892, 892-893).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Redd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 2011
81 A.D.3d 751 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Redd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONNIE REDD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 751 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1040
916 N.Y.S.2d 522

Citing Cases

PEOPLE v. REDD

April 14, 2011. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 81 AD3d 751 (Kings). Smith,…

People v. Ibarguen

However, the failure to give the charge constituted harmless error, as there was overwhelming evidence of the…