From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reclamation District No. 108

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Apr 5, 1915
169 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1915)

Opinion

Sac. No. 2289.

April 5, 1915.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. N.W. Hawkins, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Black Black, for Appellants.

Devlin Devlin, for Respondent.


In this action quo warranto instituted by the people of the state of California upon the relation of appellants, the relators alone are attempting to appeal from a judgment for defendant given upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The notice of appeal states that they take the appeal "because they are parties in interest and because the attorney-general declines to take an appeal in the name of the state." Under our law such an action may be brought and maintained only by the attorney-general in the name of the people of the state, and the relators are not "parties" to the action. An attempt to appeal by them alone is necessarily ineffectual for any purpose.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.


Summaries of

People v. Reclamation District No. 108

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Apr 5, 1915
169 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1915)
Case details for

People v. Reclamation District No. 108

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Upon the Relation of ELLA L. HERSHEY et al., Plaintiffs, v…

Court:Supreme Court of California,In Bank

Date published: Apr 5, 1915

Citations

169 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1915)
147 P. 1176

Citing Cases

People v. Petroleum Rectifying Co.

It thus affirmatively appears not only that the fact that the proceeding is entitled "by relation" does not…

People v. Milk Producers Association of Central California

But notwithstanding there is a relator, the action is by the people. ( People v. Reclamation Dist. No. 108,…