From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Read

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1987
134 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 16, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are modified, on the law, by vacating the sentences imposed; as so modified, the judgments are affirmed and the matters are remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing.

A defendant has an absolute right to be present, with counsel, during crucial stages in a criminal proceeding (see, People v Ciaccio, 47 N.Y.2d 431). Because the defendant was sentenced in the absence of counsel, the matter must be remitted for resentencing (see, People v. Taylor, 116 A.D.2d 678). Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Read

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1987
134 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Read

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL READ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Gilmore

Additionally, defendant contends that Supreme Court failed to make a sufficient inquiry to ensure that his…

People v. Gilmore

Additionally, defendant contends that Supreme Court failed to make a sufficient inquiry to ensure that his…