From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Raymond

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2017
62 N.Y.S.3d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-25-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carl RAYMOND, appellant.

Carl Raymond, Bronx, NY, appellant pro se. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Daniel Bresnahan and Jared A. Chester of counsel), for respondent.


Carl Raymond, Bronx, NY, appellant pro se.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Daniel Bresnahan and Jared A. Chester of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 3, 2017 ( People v. Raymond, 150 A.D.3d 766, 51 N.Y.S.3d 428 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered June 7, 2013.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, LaSALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Raymond

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2017
62 N.Y.S.3d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Raymond

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carl RAYMOND, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2017

Citations

62 N.Y.S.3d 285 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)