From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 27, 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., HAYES, HURLBUTT, BALIO AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35) and other crimes. Contrary to the contention of defendant, his right to confrontation was not violated by the admission of the victim's medical records in evidence. Those records fall within the business records exception to the hearsay rule ( see, CPLR 4518 [a]; White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346, 356). Defendant further contends that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion. We disagree. Based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that defendant's statement was voluntarily made ( see, People v. Anderson, 42 N.Y.2d 35, 38).


Summaries of

People v. Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 27, 2000)
Case details for

People v. Raymond

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSHUA RAYMOND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 27, 2000)