From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ratcliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 2008
53 A.D.3d 1110 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

July 3, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), entered March 14, 2007. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that Supreme Court committed a mathematical error in presumptively classifying him at that risk level in accordance with the risk assessment instrument and that the court abused its discretion in applying a presumptive override. Defendant failed to preserve those contentions for our review ( see generally People v Windham, 10 NY3d 801; People v Coleman, 45 AD3d 1118, lv denied 10 NY3d 705; People v Pierce, 27 AD3d 1182). We conclude in any event that, although the court erred in presumptively classifying defendant as a level three risk, its alternative application of the presumptive override for a prior sex felony conviction was warranted, based on defendant's prior conviction of rape in the first degree ( see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary [2006]; People v Castleberry, 43 AD3d 1369, lv denied 9 NY3d 815).

Finally, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court failed to consider his request for a downward departure inasmuch as there is no indication in the record that he made such a request ( see People v Lewis, 50 AD3d 1567). In any event, "defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances justifying a downward departure" ( People v McDaniel, 27 AD3d 1158, 1159, lv denied 7 NY3d 703; see also People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403, 404, lv denied 5 NY3d 716).


Summaries of

People v. Ratcliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 2008
53 A.D.3d 1110 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Ratcliff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THEOTIS RATCLIFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 3, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 1110 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
862 N.Y.S.2d 686

Citing Cases

People v. Iverson

Contrary to the contention of defendant, his prior felony conviction for a sex offense, i.e., rape in the…

People v. Brockington

Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender…