From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rapsey

District Court of Appeals of California, First District, Second Division
Dec 13, 1939
96 P.2d 1000 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

Summary

In People v. Rapsey, (Cal.App.) [96 P.2d 1000], a city attorney of the sixth class was held to be an employee and not an officer of the city.

Summary of this case from Barry v. County of Glenn

Opinion


96 P.2d 1000 PEOPLE, on Complaint of CHAPMAN, v. RAPSEY. No. Civ. 11062 District Court of Appeals of California, First District, Second Division December 13, 1939

Hearing Granted Feb. 8, 1940

Appeal from Superior Court, San Mateo County; Maxwell McNutt, Judge.

Quo warranto proceeding by the People of the State of California, on the complaint of B.C. Chapman, against Rudolph A. Rapsey, to oust defendant from the office of city judge of the city of San Bruno on the ground that he had accepted another incompatible office, which was that of city attorney. From a judgment dismissing the proceeding, plaintiff appeals.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Rapsey

District Court of Appeals of California, First District, Second Division
Dec 13, 1939
96 P.2d 1000 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

In People v. Rapsey, (Cal.App.) [96 P.2d 1000], a city attorney of the sixth class was held to be an employee and not an officer of the city.

Summary of this case from Barry v. County of Glenn
Case details for

People v. Rapsey

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE, on Complaint of CHAPMAN, v. RAPSEY.[*]

Court:District Court of Appeals of California, First District, Second Division

Date published: Dec 13, 1939

Citations

96 P.2d 1000 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

Citing Cases

Barry v. County of Glenn

It was held the employment of the road superintendent did not purport to create an office, but was purely an…