From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rapinett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1985
113 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

September 30, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lentol, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The record of the hearing is devoid of any evidence that defendant was represented by an attorney, in connection with this or any other matter, on either January 6, 1978, when he submitted to a polygraph test, or January 23, 1979, when he was arrested. Since, at the time of questioning, formal criminal proceedings had not yet been commenced and defendant was not, in fact, represented by an attorney, defendant's waiver of his right to counsel outside the presence of an attorney was valid (People v Rosa, 65 N.Y.2d 380; People v Mann, 60 N.Y.2d 792, 794; People v Kazmarick, 52 N.Y.2d 322, 328-329). Defendant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and are without merit. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rapinett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1985
113 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Rapinett

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH RAPINETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1985

Citations

113 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. West

ted that principle both in the old Bartolomeo cases (see, People v Bartolomeo, 53 N.Y.2d 225, supra,…

People v. Stevens

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. While a defendant may, for the first time on appeal, assert a…