From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Randall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1996
225 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 26, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.).


Defendant's claim that his guilty plea was coerced by his attorney is belied by the minutes of the plea proceeding and plea withdrawal hearing, which show that the plea represented a voluntary and intelligent choice among alternative courses of action, including exposure to a harsher sentence after trial or even after further plea negotiations ( see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 19-20).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Randall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1996
225 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Randall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLIFFORD RANDALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

People v. Fredericks

Were we to consider the claim in the interest of justice, we would find it to be lacking in any merit. The…

People v. Arroyo

Defendant's challenges to the plea are unpreserved. In any event, the record clearly establishes the…