From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Randall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 10, 2019
176 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

10062 Ind. 43/14

10-10-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony RANDALL, Defendant–Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (William B. Carney of counsel), for Appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for Respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (William B. Carney of counsel), for Appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for Respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Randall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 10, 2019
176 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Randall

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Randall…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 10, 2019

Citations

176 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 7350
107 N.Y.S.3d 863