From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1989
147 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 27, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court improperly denied his motion for a severance is without merit (see, People v Velasquez, 147 A.D.2d 726 [decided herewith]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. Moreover, upon exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).

We find no basis in the record to disturb the sentence imposed (People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1989
147 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NORMAN RAMOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
538 N.Y.S.2d 67

Citing Cases

People v. Velasquez

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant and his codefendant (see, People v Ramos, 147 A.D.2d 719…