From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2004
13 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

5015

December 28, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael A. Corriero, J.), rendered June 26, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant's claim that the court improperly denied his challenge for cause to a prospective juror is foreclosed because he did not exhaust all of his peremptory challenges (CPL 270.20). Although defendant was mistakenly offered a total of 21 peremptory challenges when he was only entitled to 15 such challenges under CPL 270.25 (2) (b), he declined to exercise the last challenge offered and, therefore, failed to exhaust all of his challenges ( People v. Lynch, 95 NY2d 243). In any event, we conclude that the court properly denied defendant's challenge for cause since the panelist did not exhibit a state of mind that was likely to preclude her from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence.


Summaries of

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2004
13 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIGUEL RAMOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 28, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
787 N.Y.S.2d 34

Citing Cases

People v. Ramos

May 18, 2005. Appeal from 1st Dept: 13 AD3d 321 (NY). Application in criminal case for leave to appeal…

People v. Major

As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits (seeCrane v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 683, 689–690, 106…