From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 7, 2019
169 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8341 Ind. 3350/14

02-07-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan RAMOS, Defendant–Appellant.

Barry A. Weinstein, Bronx, for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alexander Michaels of counsel), for respondent.


Barry A. Weinstein, Bronx, for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alexander Michaels of counsel), for respondent.

Acosta, P.J., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

Defendant's claim that his counsel provided him with ineffective assistance regarding the immigration consequences of his plea (see Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 [2010] ) is unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters not reflected in the record, and thus requires a CPL 440.10 motion (see People v. Pastor, 28 N.Y.3d 1089, 1091, 45 N.Y.S.3d 317, 68 N.E.3d 42 [2016] ). Defendant's assertion that a Padilla claim may be established by the absence of any record evidence of counsel's immigration advice is contrary to law.


Summaries of

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 7, 2019
169 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Ramos…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
91 N.Y.S.3d 886
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 965

Citing Cases

People v. Lafontant

Thus, the record does not establish whether counsel's advice was accurate or inaccurate. "Without further…

People v. Gnoka

The record is insufficient to permit adequate review of defendant's claim. Accordingly, since defendant has…