Opinion
March 16, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Initially, since no objection was raised at trial, the defendant's claims with respect to the court's charge are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, the charge, when read as a whole, was in all respects proper.
Finally, the sentence was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.