From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramlall

Court of Appeals of New York
Feb 13, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 995 (N.Y. 2020)

Opinion

No. 10

02-13-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ganesh RAMLALL, Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Ann Bordley, Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Ann Bordley, Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Term, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed.

Defendant argues that the lengthy delay of his prosecution for the traffic infraction of driving while ability impaired ( Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192[1] ) violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see People v. Taranovich , 37 N.Y.2d 442, 373 N.Y.S.2d 79, 335 N.E.2d 303 [1975] ; CPL 30.20 ). Though a close case, we conclude that, after balancing the relevant factors, defendant's claims do not rise to the level of a constitutional violation.

The People's argument that the constitutional right to a speedy trial does not apply to traffic infractions is unpreserved for our review.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Ramlall

Court of Appeals of New York
Feb 13, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 995 (N.Y. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Ramlall

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Ganesh Ramlall, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Feb 13, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 995 (N.Y. 2020)
142 N.E.3d 661
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 995
119 N.Y.S.3d 769

Citing Cases

People v. Perez

sidered: "(1) the extent of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the nature of the underlying charge;…

People v. Perez

ed his constitutional right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.20, the following factors must be…