The defendant's contention that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Smith, 73 N.Y.2d 961, 962-963). Nevertheless, we reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Johnson, 192 A.D.3d 909; People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825; People v Salako, 165 A.D.2d 846).
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.