People v. Ramirez

5 Citing cases

  1. People v. Blaker

    217 A.D.3d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

    The defendant's contention that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Smith, 73 N.Y.2d 961, 962-963). Nevertheless, we reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Johnson, 192 A.D.3d 909; People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825; People v Salako, 165 A.D.2d 846).

  2. People v. Ramirez

    No. 2021-02925 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 22, 2021)

    DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

  3. People v. Ramirez

    No. 2021-07310 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 22, 2021)

    DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

  4. People v. Ramirez

    2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 7310 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)

    DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

  5. People v. Ramirez

    2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 7310 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)

    DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 8, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Ramirez, 192 A.D.3d 825), on the ground that the resentence was excessive. ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.