From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rahman-Akond

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 7, 2020
68 Misc. 3d 128 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

2017-1257 Q CR

08-07-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mohammad RAHMAN-AKOND, Appellant.

New York City Legal Aid Society (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Queens County District Attorney (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel), for respondent.


New York City Legal Aid Society (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Queens County District Attorney (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, WAVNY TOUSSAINT, JJ

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

ALIOTTA, P.J., WESTON and TOUSSAINT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rahman-Akond

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 7, 2020
68 Misc. 3d 128 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Rahman-Akond

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mohammad Rahman-Akond…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Aug 7, 2020

Citations

68 Misc. 3d 128 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50932
130 N.Y.S.3d 181