From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Radcliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1988
145 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

December 30, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Radcliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1988
145 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Radcliff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN RADCLIFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1988

Citations

145 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)