From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Quiroz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 21, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-21-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joe QUIROZ, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott of counsel; Yuliya Shyrokonis on the memorandum), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott of counsel; Yuliya Shyrokonis on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Paynter, J.), imposed March 26, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Quiroz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 21, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Quiroz

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joe QUIROZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 21, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6105
37 N.Y.S.3d 713

Citing Cases

People v. Quiroz

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 142 AD3d 1108 (Queens)…