From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Quintana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 2011
80 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 3783.

January 18, 2011.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered March 19, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees and criminal impersonation in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York, (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Beth Fisch Cohen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Moskowitz, Renwick and Richter, JJ.


The court did not deprive defendant of his right to be present at all material stages of his trial ( see People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247, 250) when it excluded him from sidebar conferences at which counsel exercised peremptory challenges ( see e.g. People v Green, 54 AD3d 603, lu denied 11 NY3d 899). All questioning of prospective jurors took place in open court, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that defendant lacked suitable opportunities to consult with his attorney about the panelists before each of these sidebars. On the contrary, in addressing defense counsel before each of these sidebars, the court indicated that it would wait until counsel was ready. The better practice, however, would be to permit a defendant to be present at such sidebar conferences at his or her request.

Defendant asserts that his conviction of robbery in the first degree was against the weight of the evidence. However, we reject that claim ( see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The victim's testimony established that defendant displayed what appeared to be a firearm, as required under Penal Law § 160.15 (4).

The court's Sandoval ruling does not warrant reversal.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Quintana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 2011
80 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VICTOR QUINTANA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 18, 2011

Citations

80 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 262
914 N.Y.S.2d 630

Citing Cases

Quintana v. Lee

(Tarr Decl., Ex. A (Dkt. No. 9-1) at 2-55) On January 18, 2011, the Appellate Division affirmed Quintana's…

People v. Tyler

The record establishes that defendant was present at every sidebar conference when a prospective juror was…