From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Quintana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2006
29 A.D.3d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8441.

May 2, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), entered on or about April 19, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Laura R. Johnson, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Michelle Fox of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Nicole Beder of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.


In adjudicating defendant a level two sex offender, the court properly assessed points under the "forcible compulsion" and "deviate sexual intercourse" categories of the Risk Assessment Guidelines. This determination was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The grand jury minutes were "reliable hearsay evidence" (Correction Law § 168-n), and constituted a proper basis for the court's findings ( see People v. Dort, 18 AD3d 23, 25, lv denied 4 NY3d 885). We perceive no basis for a discretionary downward departure ( see People v. Guaman, 8 AD3d 545).


Summaries of

People v. Quintana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2006
29 A.D.3d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VICTOR QUINTANA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 2, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 308 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3452
813 N.Y.S.2d 299

Citing Cases

People v. Swinton

The court properly assessed 30 points for the number-of-victims factor, since the evidence established a…

People v. Imbert

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a…