From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Quinones

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Mar 18, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)

Opinion

2019-769 W CR

03-18-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luigil QUINONES, Appellant.

John P. Savoca, for appellant. Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).


John P. Savoca, for appellant.

Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, P.J., JERRY GARGUILO, ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal ( see Anders v California , 386 US 738 [1967] ). Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted ( see id. ; People v Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

RUDERMAN, P.J., GARGUILO and EMERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Quinones

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Mar 18, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
Case details for

People v. Quinones

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luigil Quinones…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Mar 18, 2021

Citations

71 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50227
141 N.Y.S.3d 234