From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Udell v. Queens Cnty. Dist. Attorney

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 15, 2014
113 A.D.3d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-01-15

The PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Bernard H. UDELL, etc., on behalf of Hashani Forrester, petitioner, v. QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et. al, respondents.

Bernard H. Udell, Brooklyn, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Daniel S. Bresnahan, and Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott of counsel), respondent pro se.


Bernard H. Udell, Brooklyn, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Daniel S. Bresnahan, and Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott of counsel), respondent pro se.

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to set bail upon Queens County Indictment No. 1719/2013.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger, 25 N.Y.2d 497, 499, 307 N.Y.S.2d 207, 255 N.E.2d 552; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson, 48 N.Y.2d 230, 422 N.Y.S.2d 55, 397 N.E.2d 745). SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Udell v. Queens Cnty. Dist. Attorney

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 15, 2014
113 A.D.3d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People ex rel. Udell v. Queens Cnty. Dist. Attorney

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Bernard H. UDELL, etc., on behalf of Hashani…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 15, 2014

Citations

113 A.D.3d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 249
978 N.Y.S.2d 703