From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lian Qiu

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 15, 2014
121 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-15

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lian QIU, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Brian Adelmann on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Brian Adelmann on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin–Brandt, J., at plea; Melendez, J., at sentence), all imposed October 9, 2012, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645; People v. Contreras, 112 A.D.3d 649, 975 N.Y.S.2d 904; People v. Torres, 109 A.D.3d 669, 970 N.Y.S.2d 884) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lian Qiu

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 15, 2014
121 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Lian Qiu

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lian QIU, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
121 A.D.3d 918
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6996

Citing Cases

People v. Sunderland

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid…

People v. Sunderland

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid…