From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Provost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 5, 1980
76 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

June 5, 1980


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered May 4, 1979, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree. The defendant contends that his sentence of a minimum of 7 1/2 to 15 years was harsh and excessive; however, he was a second felony offender and a review of his prior criminal record fully supports the sentence imposed. The defendant has not shown any abuse of discretion and his further contention that the comments of the court upon sentencing were "prejudicial" or established a bias against the defendant is without merit. The defendant contends that the procedures required on predicate felony charges pursuant to CPL 400.21 were not complied with; however, it is certain that he was aware of the charge and admitted the prior conviction. Under such circumstances, there is a sufficient compliance with statutory requirements. (People v. Linderberry, 55 A.D.2d 992; People v Parker, 55 A.D.2d 989.) Finally, defendant has not established any basis for now contending that trial counsel was inadequate and/or ineffective. Judgment affirmed. Sweeney, J.P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Provost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 5, 1980
76 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Provost

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES B. PROVOST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1980

Citations

76 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Vermette

Finally, the record reveals that defendant was clearly advised of his right to controvert the predicate…

People v. Tumminia

" Defendant's election to "stand mute" concerning that conviction does not negate the opportunity accorded…