From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Provencal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 25, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

05-25-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher PROVENCAL, appellant.

Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.


Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed July 16, 2014, as amended December 1, 2014, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence, as amended, is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Provencal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 25, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Provencal

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher PROVENCAL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 25, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 1091 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4076
30 N.Y.S.3d 853