From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Praetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1985
115 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 16, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Dutchess County (Aldrich, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel do not warrant reversal since neither inadequacy nor ineffectiveness was demonstrated; nor could defense counsel be described as lacking reasonable competence (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). Moreover, the trial court did not err in refusing to charge the jury with assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense since assault in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 120.05 (3) requires proof only of an intent to prevent a peace officer from performing a lawful duty and does not require proof of intent to cause physical injury, an essential element of assault in the third degree (People ex rel. Gray v Tekben, 57 N.Y.2d 651, affg 86 A.D.2d 176; People v Lett, 67 A.D.2d 1077). Brown, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Praetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1985
115 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Praetz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERARD WILLIAM PRAETZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Winslow

Since defendant never requested these charges, he has failed to preserve these issues for appeal (see, People…

People v. Pierce

"The crime is thus one of strict liability as far as the injury is concerned. Even if the [defendant] caused…