Opinion
August 27, 1998
Submitted by Rahul Kale, for appellant.
Submitted by Bernard J. Kahn, for respondent.
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal" (CPL 450.90[a]). Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.