From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Powell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1995
222 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 11, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenges to the legal sufficiency of the evidence are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J.P., O'Brien, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Powell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1995
222 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GURNIEL POWELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 535