From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Powell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 2001
288 A.D.2d 5 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

November 1, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered on or about November 20, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

James D. Gibbons, for respondent.

Timothy P. Harkness, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


The trial court properly admitted statements made by the complainant to the police as excited utterances. The record establishes that the complainant spoke while under the stress or influence of the excitement caused by the rape, so that her reflective capacity was stilled (see,People v. Caviness, 38 N.Y.2d 227, 230-231). The event was a forcible rape, the amount of time that had elapsed was short by any view of the evidence, and every witness agreed that at all relevant times pertaining to the statements to the police, the complainant was still crying, shaking and very upset.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Powell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 2001
288 A.D.2d 5 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BOBBY POWELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 5 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 216

Citing Cases

People v. Wolfgeorge

The non-testifying victim's statements to both a hospital police officer and an emergency room physician…

People v. Smith

We reject defendant's contention that the court erred in admitting in evidence statements of the first victim…