From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Portillo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 14, 2021
196 A.D.3d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2019–03868 Ind. No. 4488/18

07-14-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Angel PORTILLO, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Sam Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Sam Feldman of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew J. D'Emic, J.), rendered March 20, 2019, convicting him of criminal trespass in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the duration of the order of protection exceeded the maximum statutory duration because it failed to take into account the defendant's jail-time credit for the period he was incarcerated while the criminal action was pending is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d 310, 316–318, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13 ; People v. Flores, 178 A.D.3d 726, 111 N.Y.S.3d 242 ). Moreover, "[b]ecause sentencing courts are in the best position to amend permanent orders of protection, the better practice—and best use of judicial resources—is for a defendant seeking adjustment of such an order to request relief from the issuing court in the first instance, resorting to the appellate courts only if necessary" ( People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d at 317, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13 ). Under the circumstances presented, we decline to review the defendant's unpreserved contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v. DeRobertis, 191 A.D.3d 898, 138 N.Y.S.3d 919 ; People v. Flores, 178 A.D.3d at 726, 111 N.Y.S.3d 242 ; People v. Casanova, 177 A.D.3d 582, 109 N.Y.S.3d 904 ).

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Portillo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 14, 2021
196 A.D.3d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Portillo

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Angel PORTILLO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

196 A.D.3d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
147 N.Y.S.3d 455

Citing Cases

People v. Miller

Contrary to his contentions, the defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel during the…

People v. Miller

The defendant's contentions that the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing should be modified…