People v. Porterfield

2 Citing cases

  1. People v. Williams

    219 A.D.3d 1670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)   Cited 2 times

    We affirm in each appeal. As defendant contends and the People correctly concede in each appeal, defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (seePeople v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565-566, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] ; People v. Cole , 201 A.D.3d 1360, 1360-1361, 158 N.Y.S.3d 679 [4th Dept. 2022] ; People v. Porterfield , 192 A.D.3d 1662, 1662, 141 N.Y.S.3d 390 [4th Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 959, 147 N.Y.S.3d 512, 170 N.E.3d 386 [2021] ). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence in each appeal is not unduly harsh or severe.

  2. People v. Williams

    2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 4850 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

    As defendant contends and the People correctly concede in each appeal, defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied - U.S. -, 140 S.Ct. 2634 [2020]; People v Cole, 201 A.D.3d 1360, 1360-1361 [4th Dept 2022]; People v Porterfield, 192 A.D.3d 1662, 1662 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 959 [2021]). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence in each appeal is not unduly harsh or severe.