From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Polimeda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1993
198 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 1, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

While the presentence report indicates that the defendant had been physically and sexually abused as a child and that he had been hospitalized on numerous occasions for suicidal and homicidal ideations, including a two-month stay at Middletown Psychiatric Center only months prior to his commission of the instant crimes, there is no basis to support the conclusion that at the time of the plea proceedings, the defendant lacked the capacity to understand the proceedings against him or that he was unable to assist in his defense (see, CPL 730.10; People v Johnston, 186 A.D.2d 680; People v Rogers, 163 A.D.2d 337). The defendant's responses to the court's questions at his plea allocutions, when taken as a whole, do not indicate that he was incapacitated. Accordingly, the failure of the County Court to sua sponte order a competency hearing pursuant to CPL 730.10 did not constitute error. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Polimeda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1993
198 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Polimeda

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRIAN POLIMEDA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

People v. Scuderi

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court did not err…

People v. Rosado

Ordered that the judgments and the amended judgments are affirmed. The defendant's claim that he was not…