Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

People v. Polhill

237 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
People v. Polhill

2 Citing cases

  1. Ayala v. Speckard

    131 F.3d 62 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 140 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that closure was "limited not only because it last[ed] only for the testimony of one witness . . . but also because there [was] no limitation at all on the right of the public or the press to examine the transcript of the officer's testimony"

    Div. 2 d Dep't 1997) (mem.); People v. Polhill, 656 N.Y.S.2d 893 (App. Div. 2 d Dep't 1997) (mem.); People v. Rivera, 654 N.Y.S.2d 771 (App.

  2. People v. Gayle

    249 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

    The defendant's contentions regarding the closure of the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover police officer are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to consider them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Polhill, 237 A.D.2d 539). Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.