People v. Plummer

2 Citing cases

  1. People v. Manzano

    300 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 2 times

    Contrary to the defendant's contention, the verdict sheet submitted to the jury did not constitute error. The verdict sheet, which included the offense to be considered and the possible verdicts, was entirely neutral. It complied with CPL 310.20(2) and did not undermine the presumption of innocence (see People v. Phillips, 272 A.D.2d 559, 560; cf. People v. Spivey, 81 N.Y.2d 356, 361; People v. Taylor, 76 N.Y.2d 873, 874; People v. Piazza, 48 N.Y.2d 151, 165; People v. Koschtschuk, 119 A.D.2d 994, 996). There was no risk that the deliberative process or the ultimate determination of guilt was in any way affected by the verdict sheet (see People v. Plummer, 237 A.D.2d 387). SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

  2. People v. Phillips

    272 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 2 times

    Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court's submission of the verdict sheet to the jury did not constitute error. The verdict sheet, which included the offense to be considered and the possible verdicts, was entirely neutral. It complied with CPL 310.20(2) and did not undermine the defendant's presumption of innocence (see, CPL 310.20; cf., People v. Spivey, 81 N.Y.2d 356; People v. Taylor, 76 N.Y.2d 873; People v. Piazza, 48 N.Y.2d 151; People v. Koschtschuk, 119 A.D.2d 994). There was no risk that the deliberative process or the ultimate determination of guilt was in any way affected by the verdict sheet (see, People v. Plummer, 237 A.D.2d 387). JOY, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.