From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pisciotta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 4, 2013
105 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-4

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rhea PISCIOTTA, also known as Alyssa Vacca, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt. of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Yuval Simchi–Levi of counsel), for respondent.


Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt. of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Yuval Simchi–Levi of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J. at plea; Marcy L. Kahn, J. at sentencing), rendered August 5, 2010, convicting defendant of assault in the second and third degrees, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's claim that the court improperly enhanced her bargained-for sentence without sufficient inquiry is unpreserved since defendant neither requested a hearing nor moved to withdraw her plea ( see e.g. People v. Malaj, 69 A.D.3d 487, 894 N.Y.S.2d 31 [1st Dept. 2010],lv. denied15 N.Y.3d 776, 907 N.Y.S.2d 464, 933 N.E.2d 1057 [2010] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternate holding, we find that the court conducted a sufficient inquiry and properly imposed an enhanced sentence based on reliable information that defendant violated the terms of her plea agreement ( see People v. Jenkins, 11 N.Y.3d 282, 869 N.Y.S.2d 370, 898 N.E.2d 553 [2008] ). There were no disputed factual issues that required a hearing as a matter of due process ( see People v. Valencia, 3 N.Y.3d 714, 786 N.Y.S.2d 374, 819 N.E.2d 990 [2004];compare Torres v. Berbary, 340 F.3d 63 [2d Cir.2003] ). The record also establishes that defendant was sufficiently warned of the meaning and consequences of absconding from her drug program.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, ABDUS–SALAAM, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pisciotta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 4, 2013
105 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Pisciotta

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rhea PISCIOTTA, also…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2327
961 N.Y.S.2d 779

Citing Cases

People v. Rousseau

Defendant argues that she was denied due process when the court declined to reopen the hearing to admit…