From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pipkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 2010
77 A.D.3d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-00025.

October 12, 2010.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), dated December 22, 2009, which denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on September 24, 1999.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel).

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Michael Shollar of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Lott, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, on substantial justice grounds, the defendant's motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 ( see CPL 440.46; see also L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The defendant had been convicted of two prior violent felonies, and during his approximately 10-year incarceration on the instant offense, he received disciplinary tickets for twelve tier II and five tier III infractions, including tickets for violent conduct and possessing contraband ( see People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747, 747-748; People v Perez, 57 AD3d 921, 922; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156, 1156-1157).


Summaries of

People v. Pipkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 2010
77 A.D.3d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Pipkin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN PIPKIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7368
908 N.Y.S.2d 594

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

Ordered that the order is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court providently…

People v. Myles

whether the defendant has a history of parole or probation violations ( see People v. Overton, 86 A.D.3d 4,…