From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. PiParo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1998
256 A.D.2d 91 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 10, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J., at plea; Harold Silverman, J., at sentence).


Defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The record establishes that defendant waived his right to appeal as a condition of the plea bargain ( see, People v. Aponte, 212 A.D.2d 157). Accordingly, review of defendant's challenge to his sentence on the ground of excessiveness is foreclosed ( People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733). Moreover, were we to review the issue, we would find that the sentence is in no way excessive.

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. PiParo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1998
256 A.D.2d 91 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. PiParo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID PiPARO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 91 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

People v. James

Moreover, as part of his plea, defendant waived his right to appeal. When a defendant knowingly,…