From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pinnock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2002-11349.

April 11, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered December 6, 2002, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, rape in the first degree (two counts), sodomy in the first degree (three counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Raphael F. Scotto, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Keith Dolan, and Ron Carny of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. On this record, we find that he was afforded meaningful representation ( see People v. Stultz, 2 NY3d 277; People v. Henry, 95 NY2d 563; People v. Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Pinnock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Pinnock

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ASTOR PINNOCK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 345